----- Experience in your own room the magical nature of stereo sound -----

 

 

What's new

 

LX - Store

 

Conversations
with Fitz

 

OPLUG
Forum

 

Basics

The Magic in 2-Channel Sound

Issues in speaker
design

Dipole models

Active filters

Amplifiers etc

Microphone

FAQ's

Loudspeakers

Crossovers

Room acoustics

Stereo Recording and Rendering

Audio production

Conclusions

 

Projects

Your own design

LXmini

LXmini+2

LXstudio

LX521.4

LX521
reference

ORION
challenge

ORION-3.4

PLUTO-2.1

WATSON-SEL

PLUTO+
subwoofer

THOR
subwoofer

PHOENIX
dipole speaker

Three-Box active
system (1978)

Reference
earphones

Surround
sound

Loudspeaker
& Room

 

Resources

Publications

Sound recordings

Links

Other designs

My current setup

About me

Site map

 

HOME

 

------------------
Digital Photo
Processes

 

------------------
The
Sea Ranch

 

------------------
My Daughter
the Jeweler

 

What's new

 

LX - Store

 

Conversations
with Fitz

 

OPLUG
Forum

 

 

 

    My current audio and video setups

     >> in Sea Ranch, CA <<                                      >> in Corte Madera, CA <<

 

 June 2017 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

My LX521.4 speakers use an analog signal processor ASP.4 with the same transfer functions as were derived for the miniDS 4x10HD. 
An Oppo Sonica DAC plays my music collection, which resides on a 1 TB HD. Selection of files and volume control is done via iPad. 
Alternatively an Oppo CD/DVD player is used to play discs and also to stream various Video and Music services. Likewise the notebook is used for streaming from the Internet.

 

In a different part of the house I have set up an LXmini based audio and video system. Internet music is streamed via the iPod. The Notebook PC is used only occasionally. 

-------------------------------------------------- I am done and happy ----------------------------------------------------------

 

December, 2013

Upgrading the LX521.4 electronics

March 2017 

  • Originally I had been using the LX521 with its 3-way ASP and AT6012. But then I converted the system to 4-way digital with miniDSP4x10HD
    .
  • For several years now, I have been using 10 channels of an AT6012, 12x60W, power amplifier to drive the LX521.4. The input signals to the AT6012 come from a miniDSP 4x10HD digital signal processor. It is driven from my notebook PC's USB output via a miniDSP USB streamer's conversion to optical input for the 4x10HD.

  • My first step now was to replace the AT6012 with the AT528NC, 8x200W, power amplifier. The difference was audible within seconds - and independent of volume level - as greatly increased clarity, darker bass and fine spatial imaging detail. This change is a "no-brainer". The AT528NC is absolutely going to stay. 
    What surprised me, was that I now hear a sound, which is very similar to my memory of the PowerBox 6pro NCore at my place in Corte Madera. And that with the miniDSP 4x10HD in the signal chain! Sometime I will have to set up a direct comparison in CM.

  • The next step was to replace the miniDSP 4x10HD with the OPPO Sonica DAC and ASP.4 prototype. The DAC is driven directly via USB from my PC. I had tried this setup in Corte Madera. It sounded less transparent compared to the PowerBox 6pro system and with the edges more rounded, less black and more brown, but pleasant in its own way. My friend, JV, a professional in audio production came for a listen and using just a minute of one of his orchestral recordings, immediately found the ASP.4 quite different from the PowerBox: less open, grainy and maybe compressing. He could not live with it. The Sonica DAC is not likely the culprit, because we both heard an earlier OPPO HA-1 DAC driving the Kii 3 speakers to astounding clarity and smoothness. 
    But here in Sea Ranch it was about comparing the ASP.4 + Sonica DAC to the miniDSP 4x10HD. That became a repeat of my experience in CM, with the ASP.4 having less clarity, less imaging precision and black, but more brown.
    My neighbor here, NP, a seasoned Class A amplifier designer, who listens at much lower volume levels than I prefer, summed it up: "Give me one of these and one of those a customer might say". But we both believe that analog should be at least as accurate as digital. So tomorrow we will get together in his workshop to perform a bunch of electrical tests on the ASP.4 to identify a reason for the sonic difference, which we hear.

  • We were successful and identified an immediate problem and several potential problems. The immediate problem was a defective +/-12V power supply, which put a noisy 180 Hz modulation at very low level on signals in tweeter, upper-mid, lower-mid and woofer channels. This explains why the OPA2134 loaded pcb sounded too warm and was improved by loading it with LM4562's, which have higher supply rejection. A change of power supply resolved the issue.
    .
    Next we checked at specific frequencies the total harmonic distortion plus noise output versus input signal level. The tweeter channel clips at 10 kHz with 6.5 V input, which corresponds to 6 V output, or 17 Vpp. No problems here.
    The Upper Midrange channel measurement at 3 kHz and higher frequencies is shown below. Clipping is at 2.7 V in, corresponding to 1.3 V out due to the frequency response attenuation. Further investigation is need in particular because peak and dip filters have very large resonance voltages, which at 5.4 kHz and 9 kHz lead to internal circuitry clipping. A circuit change is needed, which does not degrade noise performance significantly. Presently, noise is not audible.




    The Lower Mid channel, at 150 Hz, clips at 5 V in with 5 V out.  Further investigation is needed why the levels are not higher.
    The woofer channel, at 50 Hz, clips at 4 V in with 7 V out, which seems fine.

    We found that crosstalk between left and right channels at -40 to -50 dB is too high. This may be as easy to fix as placing the two pcb next to each other, rather than on top of each other. Also I am highly suspicious, from looking at the pcb trace layout, that crosstalk between T, UM, LM and W sections on the pcb are too high. I will investigate.

  • Further work is needed before I am satisfied with an ASP.4. But I already hear now, with the power supply replaced, a realism from the Sonica DAC and ASP.4 proto, that I have no hesitation to replace the miniDSP 4x10HD by that combination. And ultimately I envision an LX521.4 with ASP to be my top design. 

  • UPDATE, 26 March 2017 - I now have measured the ASP.4 extensively for frequency response in magnitude and phase and compared the data to the miniDSP 4x10HD target transfer functions. I reduced the gain of the LM channel by 1 dB, and changed some circuitry in the UM channel to reduce internal signal levels, thereby increasing already high overload margins. I have measured 2-tone intermodulation distortion in each band and within internal circuitry. I tested for crosstalk between L and R channels and for crosstalk from T, LM and W channels into the UM channel. It all is extremely low. No spurious MHz oscillations detected. Noise is inaudible. I know of nothing to change at this point, which might increase audible performance. The revised circuit diagram is part of the LX521 owner support documentation.

    Compared to the PowerBox 6pro NCore I sometimes hear subtle differences. But I cannot say which component in the signal chain causes them since I use a completely different front end and power amplifiers for the LX521.4 with ASP.4. Maybe I will track it down eventually and thereby add to my understanding of sonic modifiers. I will certainly enjoy my new system in Sea Ranch.

  • Why do I want an ASP.4? Because it would make the LX521.4 a self-contained product, which I can optimize in the analog world that I am most familiar with. But as all my listening these days is to digital sources I cannot get around the influence of a DAC upon what I hear. At this point the PowerBox 6pro NCore with its DLCP and DACs and driven from USB via afi reclocker has a touch of engagement, which is missing from the Sonica DAC and ASP.4 combination, although its presentation is eminently smooth and just as dynamic. No differences in timbre or frequency extension. I am hoping to get other listener's impressions during the upcoming Open House.

  • Hurrah! I found the weak spot. It takes the artistic-fidelity isolator & USB Module in front of the Oppo Sonica DAC to bring the ASP.4 plus AT528NC based system to the level where I can totally enjoy it and become deeply engaged emotionally. 
    The ASP.4 is not limiting the sonic performance of the LX521.4! 
    Transfer of audio data from laptop to DAC and performance of the DAC are the critical elements for the ASP.4 plus AT528NC analog system.

         

 

==============================================================

 

 

In our vacation home on the Pacific Coast of Northern California I have set up both, the LX521 and the PLUTO, loudspeaker systems. 
Our new "Vista Room" with a sweeping view towards the ocean is also a great music room day or night. The TV screen sits on a rolling cart and can be moved between the speakers for watching movies from a large L-shaped sofa/queen bed. Four steps lead into the room behind the sofa, coming from the hallway to the right of the photo. Thus the wall  at 50" (1.25 m) behind the listener is not as far removed as I would have wanted. We had to stay within building restrictions.  But I am very satisfied with the sound. It has an intimate feeling. 

As source for various disc formats I use the Oppo BDP-95. I bring a WD 1 TB hard drive with more music files from home. My Nexus 4 phone with a "TuneIn Radio" app provides Internet radio stations. A NAD preamp sets the volume and a AT6012 provides amplification. 

 

 

PLUTO resides in a separate living area, which is open to the dining area on the left and the kitchen behind the viewer. For optimum imaging performance the speakers can be pulled forward, but this is rarely done. Audio input to the system is from a CD/DVD player, iPod,  audio and video cassette tape players (!) or TV. 

 

 

 

===================================================

 

 

Past setups in vacation cottages on the coast

View from the sleeping loft into the living room of "Honeymoon Cottage" at The Sea Ranch, CA, on the Pacific Coast.

 

Living room of HMC with ORION loudspeakers.
The cottage was sold in 2010.

PLUTO loudspeakers in "Sea Pine Cottage", which is close to the ocean in Sea Ranch. 

The cottage has been remodeled and enlarged to also accommodate LX521 loudspeakers. 

 

    

================================================================= 

 

 

What you hear is not the air pressure variation in itself 
but what has drawn your attention
in the streams of superimposed air pressure variations 
at your eardrums

An acoustic event has dimensions of Time, Tone, Loudness and Space
Have they been recorded and rendered sensibly?

___________________________________________________________
Last revised: 09/07/2017   -  1999-2017 LINKWITZ LAB, All Rights Reserved