----- Build your last loudspeakers yourself -----

 

 

What's new

 

Concepts

Stereo Recording and Rendering

Audio production

Loudspeakers

Crossovers

Room acoustics

Issues in 
speaker design

 

 

Projects

LXmini

LX521
reference

ORION
challenge

ORION-3.4

PLUTO-2.1

WATSON-SEL

PLUTO+
subwoofer

THOR
subwoofer

PHOENIX
dipole speaker

    Dipole models

    Active filters

    Microphone

     FAQ

Three-Box active
system (1978)

Reference
earphones

Surround
sound

Loudspeaker
& Room

 

 

Assemblies

LX521

ORION

PLUTO

Do-It-Yourself

 

 

Resources

Publications

Sound recordings

Links

Other designs

My current setup

About me

Site map

 

 

Conclusions

 

 

HOME

 

--------------------
ORION
PLUTO
LX521

Users Group

 

 

--------------------
Digital Photo
Processes

 

 

What's new

 

 

Recording & Rendering

--- Recording & Rendering 101 --- Acoustics vs. Hearing --- Subjective evaluation --- 
--- Room optimized stereo --- Sound reproduction --- Recording what we hear ---
--- Experimental results --- Theory --- SRA --- Sound field control --- 

 

 

Subjective evaluation of phantom acoustic scenes

Several documents of the European Broadcasting Union, EBU, deal with the evaluation of program material in production and broadcasting. In particular, 2-channel material for loudspeaker reproduction, which is rendered as a phantom acoustic scene, is assessed by six parameters:

  • Spatial impression
  • Stereo impression
  • Transparency
  • Sound balance
  • Timbre
  • Freedom from noise and distortion

The EBU provides an audio test CD, PEQS, with examples for explaining the above parameters in greater detail. The  CD can be downloaded for free in .flac format from the EBU website, and also a user's handbook EBU-TECH 3287 [3].

Each parameter and an overall 'Main impression' are ranked on a scale from 1 to 6:
  1. Bad
  2. Poor
  3. Fair
  4. Good
  5. Very good
  6. Excellent

Only integer values are allowed. 
The median values for n testers are plotted 
on a 7-axis graph. The dark line represents a ranking of 'good' for all parameters. 'Excellent' ranking marks are placed on the outermost circle [4].

 

Listening conditions

The EBU specifies a range of listening conditions to assure consistent evaluation of recorded material [1, 2]. The acoustic properties of the listening room, its size and proportions, placement of loudspeakers and listener, affect the influence of reflections, reverberation and room resonances (modes) upon the subjective impression of the phantom acoustic scene.

           

Most important for critical listening is the ratio of direct loudspeaker sound to room reflected and reverberated sound at the listening position. The D/R ratio is frequency dependent, if off-axis radiation from the loudspeaker changes with frequency. Ideally a loudspeaker has constant directivity so that the reflected and reverberated sound has the same spectral content as the direct sound. In addition, if early reflections are delayed by more than 6 ms, then the brain can focus attention upon the direct sound streams from the two loudspeakers and withdraw attention from the room sound, which carries redundant information for the creation of the phantom acoustic scene between the loudspeakers. 

The assumed loudspeaker in Ref. [1] is a typical box loudspeaker, which radiates uniformly into all directions at low frequencies and becomes increasingly forward directional due to baffle and driver size at higher frequencies. It is not a constant directivity loudspeaker. The loudspeaker's behavior determines the room requirements in order to obtain a D/R ratio of better than -6 dB, which is needed for effective monitoring. Thus the 200 Hz to 4 kHz reverberation time Tm must be around 250 ms for a 100 m3 volume, e.g. for a 5 x 8 x 2.5 m room [1, 2].  A considerable amount of room treatment material is required to achieve this low Tm. It is equivalent to 45% of the room's surface area to behave like open windows for letting sound escape. A constant directivity loudspeaker such as the LX521 Monitor will achieve the same D/R ratio in a much more lively room, such as a normal living room. 

 

Parameters for assessing a phantom acoustic scene 

It is difficult to describe an aural scene without a common language and understanding of terms. The PEQS CD provides examples for each of the parameters below.  

Each of the above parameters is explained in alphabetical order below.

 

Recorded examples to illustrate different evaluation parameters

The user's handbook [3] for the PEQS CD points out what to listen for in the different tracks and leads to practical learning experiences, which then can be applied to the evaluation of other recordings. 

 

Equipment evaluation

A second CD, SQAM, provides short tracks of single instruments, vocal, speech, vocal & orchestra, orchestra and pop music to check the playback equipment [5]. Both CDs can be downloaded for free in .flac format.

 

References

[1] Subjective assessment of audio quality - The means and methods within the EBU, EBU-Technical Review, (Winter 1997)

[2] Listening conditions for the assessment of sound program material: monophonic and 2-channel stereophonic, EBU-Tech. 3276 - 2nd edition, (May 1998)

[3] EBU-TECH 3287, User's handbook for the EBU PEQS CD, , Parameters for the subjective evaluation of sound program material (PEQS), (October 2008)

[4] Assessment methods for the subjective evaluation of the quality of sound program material - Music, Tech. 3286-E, (August 1997)

[5] EBU-TECH 3253, User's handbook for the EBU SQAM CD, Sound quality assessment material recordings for subjective tests, (September 2008)

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
What you hear is not the air pressure variation in itself 
but what has drawn your attention
in the two streams of superimposed air pressure variations at your eardrums

An acoustic event has dimensions of Time, Tone, Loudness and Space
Have they been recorded and rendered sensibly?

___________________________________________________________
Last revised: 06/28/2014   -  1999-2014 LINKWITZ LAB, All Rights Reserved